Echoes of Y2K heard by stupid ears.
Apparently the issue of climate change is comparable to the Y2K bug. I can definitely see how that's the case if you ignore the obvious differences in available evidence and, well the fact that they are not comparable AT ALL. Y2K was entirely speculative, the product of circulating one crackpot's baseless claims. It happened to also make a very good story. Scientists generally don't share the same low standards as journalists. This comes from a clear conflict between scientific methodology and the act of making shit up.
Just to clarify.
Climate change- SUPPORTED BY SCIENCE, OBSERVABLE, NOT BASED ON ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
Y2K- NONE OF THE ABOVE.
You people don't get to be part of the sceptics club. It's amazing how often ignoring solid evidence is worn like some intellectual badge of honour
Popularity: 12% [?]
Enjoy this article?
